CSG is an interesting gas when compared to ‘conventional’ gases. ‘Conventional’ gas has migrated away from coal and organic rich sedimentary rocks into other porous rocks. The gas is then held in place by impermeable layers. What makes CSG different is that the gas has only migrated very small distances (if at all) to natural pore spaces such as fractures (cleats) in the coal layers. These pore spaces usually contain natural water that was left in the coal when it was laid down or water that subsequently migrated into the coal seam. The water associated with the coal seam is very important because it is actually the pressure of the water in the coal seam that keeps the gas in place. It is the hydrostatic pressure that keeps the gas in place.
In open cut or underground coal mining, CSG is a curse. It is considered a waste product and an explosion hazard. It is therefore vented as much as possible to make the coal mines safe to work in. The recent Pike River Mine explosion in New Zealand is an example where the failure to vent enough CSG caused a tragedy. As water is removed from coal mines the chances for gas mobilisation increases due to the above mentioned effect of hydrostatic pressure. This further increases the risk of explosion in coal mines.
Idealised relationship between CSG and water production |
Many people are concerned about CSG in Australia, particularly in our northern rivers region. This concern is driven by the possible effect of CSG extraction on beneficial groundwater. The use of techniques such as hydraulic fracturing that may be used to increase or prolong gas production is also raised as a concern. To keep this post short I will cover both of these issues in future. However, I will suffice to say that there is evidence that groundwater can be affected during CSG extraction despite producers trying not to have any impact. These are particularly noted in certain geological formations. There are also situations where there is no impact on important aquifers too. This matter is clearly quite complex and a one size fits all understanding does not apply very well. Hopefully, my future posts will tease the details out a little bit more.
Hi Rod
ReplyDeleteAs both you and I know there is a lot of resistance to CSG mining and maybe it is a good thing too. What I really like about your CSG posts is that you give a non-polarised view of the subject and simply state the process warts and all. I have directed quite a few people to your site so they can understand that some of what is going on for themselves. Good on you and always looking forward to your next post.
Dylan
Thanks for checking by again Dylan. Thank you too for letting people know about my little blog. I hope it helps.
DeleteLet me second that endorsement. It's fundamental to get some basics on the scene underground so we can judge the quality of claims made by opponents and proponents of CSG.
DeleteSadly, the gas rush is getting a long way ahead of knowledge and monitoring capability in Queensland. I hear from insiders that it's basically open slather in the Great Artesian Basin, and groundwater monitoring is many years behind: there are relatively speaking just a handful of monitored sites compared with the many thousands of wells sunk, and reporting quality is also inconsistent.
Hi Nick, thank you for a second endorsement! I'm glad that I seem to be able to help.
DeleteThough I share much of your sentiment about the Great Artesian Basin, I did say in the last part of the post that the degree of risk is different from place to place. For example one of the big risks of CSG production in the GAB is the reduction in pressure head of aquifers. This reduction in pressure head can affect the discharge areas such as the ecologically sensitive spring mounds in desert Queensland and South Australia. That situation does not apply in the Northern Rivers. However, I'm sure there are things that are risks in our region that don't apply in the GAB too!
Every place is different and therefore the issues are almost always different too. That can be a good thing... and it can be a bad thing too.
Fantastic insight to the CSG issue and extraction, Rod. I hadn't known much about this, and I really appreciate your objective outline of the process.
ReplyDeleteAs with those above, I like to share your posts, as what you write as it is easy to understand by non-geologists.
Thanks wangiwriter. I'm glad that you think these blog posts are worth sending on to others. I appreciate your support!
DeleteThank you for writing about this. I had begun to despair over whether it was possible to find science based information, that is comprehensible to the layman as regards CSG in New South Wales. I appreciate the balanced viewpoint you've provided (and understand your circumspection in regards to the politically incendiary nature of CSG). It's a pleasure to read your blog, thank you for writing!
ReplyDeleteHi Chrischips,
DeleteA pleasure to have you visit and comment. I have only done a few other blog posts on CSG due to me being too timid to delve into the details much but feel free to look at my other posts this topic and on natural gas in general. A summary of posts can be found here:
http://nrgeology.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/list-of-natural-gas-posts.html
Regards,